A Tale of Two Escobars: Federal Courts Begin Grappling with Opposing Views of “Materiality”

A Tale of Two Escobars: Federal Courts Begin Grappling with Opposing Views of “Materiality”

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly anticipated opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar, which for the first time expressly recognized implied certification as a viable theory under the federal False Claims Act (FCA).

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

SCOTUS to Consider City of Miami’s Predatory Lending Lawsuit Against Banks

By | Florida Banking Law Blog | August 25, 2016

In a case that will have a direct impact on creditors, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal involving the City of Miami’s claims in three related cases that it suffered damages through alleged discriminatory lending practices of residential mortgage lenders including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Supreme Court Decision Restricts Government Prosecution of Political Corruption

In a unanimous 8-0 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has vacated the political corruption convictions of former Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell for conspiracy to commit honest services fraud and Hobbs Act extortion and making false statements to federal officials. McDonnell v. United States, No. 15-474, 579 U.S. ___ (2016).

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Signed, Sealed, Delivered, but Not Dismissed: The Sixth Circuit Takes On Campbell-Ewald’s Offered Vs. Delivered Distinction

Signed, Sealed, Delivered, but Not Dismissed: The Sixth Circuit Takes On Campbell-Ewald’s Offered Vs. Delivered Distinction

Following the Supreme Court’s January decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663 (2016) that a defendant cannot moot a plaintiff’s individual claim by simply offering to satisfy the plaintiff’s demand before a motion for class certification is filed, but must instead deliver that relief, the lower courts have struggled to identify when relief has been delivered versus merely “offered.”

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Supreme Court Stays Fourth Circuit Transgender Case

By | Education Law Review | August 4, 2016
Supreme Court Stays Fourth Circuit Transgender Case

Yesterday (August 3), the Supreme Court voted 5-3 to stay the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in G. G. v. Gloucester County (VA) School Board, No. 15-2056, wherein the Court of Appeals ruled that under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 the school district must allow a transgender student to use the bathroom facilities of the student’s gender identity (in this case a female who identified as a male).

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus