Judge Jed Rakoff

Creative, but Perhaps Too Creative, Lawyering in Legal Filings Copyright Case

Posted on March 6, 2013 by Lindsey Shoshany

U.S. District Judge Rakoff ruled on whether copying legal filings amounts to copyright infringement.  His verdict: it does not. Full Story

Recommend:

Judge Rakoff On the Edge Act and "Local Prejudices of State Courts"

Posted on February 28, 2013 by Tony Coles

Investors who lost money in the housing crisis may prefer to have their case heard by a hometown jury in state court, instead of as a federal securities fraud claim. Full Story

Recommend:
Rajat Gupta Ordered to Repay Goldman Sachs $6.2 Million for Attorney’s Fees

Rajat Gupta Ordered to Repay Goldman Sachs $6.2 Million for Attorney’s Fees

Posted on February 26, 2013 by Kevin LaCroix

By the time you read this blog post, you undoubtedly will have seen one of the stories in the mainstream media reporting on the February 25, 2013 decision of Southern District Court Jed Rakoff ordering former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta to repay most of the legal fees the company incurred in connection with the government’s investigation and prosecution of Gupta. Full Story

Recommend:

Judge Rakoff Issues First Verdict Ever for Insurer and Against Bank for Really Bad Mortgages

Posted on February 23, 2013 by Tony Coles

Judge Rakoff issued an opinion with significant implications for parties litigating cases involving mortgage backed securities. Full Story

Recommend:
Judge Rakoff V. SEC and Citigroup

Judge Rakoff V. SEC and Citigroup

Posted on August 15, 2012 by Russell Koonin

Judge Rakoff Not Going Out Quietly

In a story we’ve been following since the outset, on Monday, Judge Rakoff filed his brief before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It is not every day that you see a federal judge litigating against two parties who were theoretically adverse before him. But that is precisely the framework of this appeal. Full Story

Recommend:

Judge Rakoff Submits Brief to Second Circuit in SEC-Citi Settlement Appeal

Posted on August 13, 2012 by Structured Finance Litigation Team

On August 13, 2012, appointed pro bono counsel for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York filed a brief in support of United States District Judge Jed S. Rakoff’s decision to reject a proposed $285 million settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Citigroup. Full Story

Recommend:

Judge Rakoff Approves the Picard/Wilpons/Mets Settlement: is It Now Really "Over" Under Yogi Berra’s Definition? – Installment 78

Posted on June 7, 2012 by Michael Kline

On May 31, 2012, Federal District Judge Jed S. Rakoff issued his much-anticipated and delayed Order approving the settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) between Madoff Trustee Irving Picard and the numerous defendants, constituting the Wilpon-Katz-Mets individual, business, family trust and charitable interests (collectively, the “Wilpons”). Full Story

Recommend:
The SEC V. Citigroup Appeal: SEC and Citigroup File Their Briefs Explaining Why Judge Rakoff’s Opinion Should Be Vacated

The SEC V. Citigroup Appeal: SEC and Citigroup File Their Briefs Explaining Why Judge Rakoff’s Opinion Should Be Vacated

Posted on May 17, 2012 by William McGrath

On Monday, May 14, 2012, both the SEC and the Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. filed their appellate briefs (available here and here) in the three consolidated appeals regarding Judge Jed Rakoff’s November 28, 2011 Opinion and Order rejecting the SEC’s proposed settlement with Citigroup. Full Story

Recommend:

Judge Rakoff Issues Opinion in Civil Gupta Case Explaining Why He Will Not Compel the SEC to Produce Documents Relating to Settlement Negotiations

Posted on May 2, 2012 by William McGrath

In a Memorandum Order entered on May 1, 2012, Judge Jed Rakoff formally denied a motion to compel by Rajat Gupta and Raj Rajaratnam, who were seeking an order that the SEC produce documents concerning settlement negotiations between the Commission and cooperating witnesses. In an April 11, 2012 telephone conference, Judge Rakoff tentatively ruled in the Commission’s favor, but allowed the parties to submit letter briefs on the issue. Full Story

Recommend:
Strange Bedfellows

Strange Bedfellows

Posted on April 4, 2012 by Russell Koonin

In a sharply worded opinion, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay to the district court proceedings in S.E.C. v. Citigroup, in the Southern District of New York. There, Judge Rakoff had previously refused to approve a proposed $285 million settlement in a case where, simultaneous with the filing of the complaint charging Citigroup with negligent misrepresentation under 15 USC ss. 77q(a)(2) and (3), the S.E.C. and Citigroup jointly presented a proposed consent judgment to the district court for approval.

Full Story

Recommend:

Conference Coverage

Video interviews

Network Twitter Feed

LXBNLXBN: The Direction of CEQA “Reform” Under Proposed SB 731: One Step Up and Three Steps Back? http://t.co/BNOOs6CEIc - @msrlegal
1 day ago
LXBNLXBN: Great Disappearing Acts: CA Considers Two Bills Addressing the Removal of Online Information of Minors http://t.co/2KLVOMA2eZ - @MintzLevin
1 day ago
LXBNLXBN: Will the IRS Scandal Derail Tax Reform? http://t.co/fVMlhEJ9FJ - @Politics_Law
1 day ago
LXBNLXBN: CalPERS Releases Circular Addressing Affordable Care Act http://t.co/rMCRVxWUJK - @lcwlegal
1 day ago
LXBNLXBN: Washington’s New BUI Laws: Now Alcohol and Water Really Do Not Mix http://t.co/gKq2dySY0M - @GrahamDunnPC
1 day ago
Join Us on Facebook

Become a Part of the Conversation

LexBlog partners with professionals to develop custom social media solutions and strategies that foster impactful relationships through powerful Internet identities.

Learn more

New to The LexBlog Network