The Kirtsaeng Opinion: Supreme Court Guidance On Attorneys’ Fees Awards in Copyright Cases

The Kirtsaeng Opinion: Supreme Court Guidance On Attorneys’ Fees Awards in Copyright Cases

Recently, in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court provided substantial guidance in an unsettled area of law by holding that, when deciding whether to award attorneys’ fees under 17 U.S.C. §505, the Copyright Act’s fee-shifting provision, a court should give substantial weight to the objective reasonableness of the losing party’s position while still taking into account all other circumstances relevant to granting fees.

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Brexit News: What Next for European Trade Mark Protection in the Light of the UK Referendum Result?

With the overnight referendum result in the UK, and the UK voting to leave the EU, a number of our clients are asking what the effect will be on their European Union Trade Mark (“EUTM”) Registrations, whether they will continue to offer protection in the UK, and/or whether they should be contemplating new national UK trade mark filings. 

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Supreme Court Upholds Use of BRI Standard in Cuozzo

By | PTABWatch | June 23, 2016
Supreme Court Upholds Use of BRI Standard in Cuozzo

In Cuozzo Speed Technologies, Inc., v. Lee, the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit’s decision, upholding the PTAB’s use of the BRI standard for claim interpretation in IPRs, and determining that 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars judicial review of the PTAB’s decision to institute review on grounds not specifically raised in the IPR petition.

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus