Supreme Court Addresses CEQA Subsequent Review Rules in San Mateo Gardens Case

By | CEQA Developments | September 22, 2016

The California Supreme Court provided needed clarification to some aspects of the operation of CEQA’s “subsequent review” rules (Pub. Resources Code, § 21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162) in its highly anticipated opinion, filed on September 9, 2016, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District (2016) ___ Cal.5th ___, 2016 WL 4978435.  

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

BLM Moves Forward with Phase I of Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan

Phase I of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) has now been approved, paving the way for streamlined permitting and environmental review of qualified renewable energy projects on Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-administered lands in the Mojave and Colorado/Sonoran desert regions of Southern California.

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

California Supreme Court Addresses Subsequent Review Under CEQA; Rejects Lishman “New Project” Test

In an opinion by Justice Kruger, the Supreme Court of California unanimously reversed the Court of Appeal in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District, Cal. Supreme Court, Case No. S214061 (September 19, 2016).

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

EPA Researches How Sunscreens Containing Engineered Nanomaterials Might Change When Exposed to Chemicals in Pool Water

An August 15, 2016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) blog item describes EPA’s research on sunscreens containing engineered nanomaterials and how they might change when exposed to chemicals in pool water. 

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

EPA Addresses Aggregation Concerns with Clean Air Act Exemption

By | Emerging Energy Insights | September 20, 2016

Under EPA’s revised Regional Consistency regulations (codified in 40 C.F.R. Part 56) , sources located in different parts of the country may be subject to a different “single source” aggregation test or other Clean Air Act policies based on decisions of the federal courts with local jurisdiction.

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus

Neither CEQA Administrative Record Preparation Statute nor Case Law Precludes Award of Costs to Prevailing Real Party Who Reimburses Lead Agency Its Costs of Record Preparation

By | CEQA Developments | September 19, 2016

In the published portion of an opinion filed September 12, 2016, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order taxing costs in the amount of $44,889.71 which were claimed by prevailing real party in interest Wal-Mart in connection with preparation of the administrative record. 

Tweet Like LinkedIn LinkedIn Google Plus