The recent news headline “Jimmy John’s Notifies Customers of Payment Card Security Incident” caught our attention because the credit and debit card information was stolen at 216 Jimmy John’s locations, including in states with Taft offices: Arizona, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio.
The Sixth Circuit has never held either way on the propriety of making incentive payments to class representatives in class action settlements.
A US appeals court has dismissed a proposed securities fraud class action, clarifying when a corporation will be deemed to make misstatements knowingly.
In his recent decision in McSherry v. Zimmer GMBH, Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court certified a national opt out class action that dovetails with a related national opt in class action previously certified in British Columbia.
A recent class action settlement has brought fresh attention to two age-old questions. The first: does Red Bull actually give you wings? The second: how carefully should courts screen out bogus claimants from proposed classes of refund-seeking consumers?
“Sometimes surrender is the best option.” That is how Judge Raymond J. Dearie of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York described how the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment may be used by employers to pay—i.e., “pick off”—individual plaintiffs to defeat a broader and significantly more costly FLSA collective action in his recent opinion in Anjum v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc..
Another Federal Court Decertifies FLSA Collective Action of Hospital Workers Challenging Auto-Deduct Policy
We have previously discussed that, while medical providers have become a common target of plaintiffs asserting wage and hour claims arising out of so-called “auto-deduct” policies, more and more courts are realizing that the inherently fact-specific nature of these lawsuits make class treatment very difficult. See our posts from June 23, 2014, and September 17, 2014].
Dead Again: Ontario Court of Appeal Makes Clear That Certification of Misclassification Overtime Class Actions Remains As Hard As Ever
Last week, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Brown v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, upholding the Divisional Court’s decision affirming the dismissal of a certification motion in a proposed “misclassification” overtime class action (previously blogged about in the spring and fall of 2013).
A federal district judge in Hammond, Indiana, has permitted a rail union to pursue injunctive remedies in a Title VII pattern-or-practice discrimination claim on behalf of its black members without compliance with Rule 23.