On December 11, 2017, the NY Times’ headline read: Under Trump, E.P.A. Has Slowed Actions Against Polluters, and Put Limits on Enforcement Officers.  The article reviews EPA enforcement during the first nine months of the Trump Administration.  The writers cite not only statistical comparisons with the first year of the Bush and Obama EPAs, but also quote an internal enforcement memorandum, interviews with current and former EPA staff, and residents at a facility under investigation in Ohio. View Full Post
As noted in this space, on October 16, 2017, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued a memorandum announcing new policies to avoid what he considered inappropriate approaches to resolving litigation, commonly referred to by the rubric “sue and settle.”  The major changes in policy included inviting participation by all interested parties in any settlement negotiations, more aggressive defense of claims based on alleged non-discretionary duties or deadlines, and refusal to pay attorneys fees to plaintiffs in connection with settlements.  View Full Post
As noted previously on this blog, on October 16, 2017, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued a memorandum announcing new policies to avoid what he considered inappropriate approaches to resolving litigation, commonly referred to by the rubric “sue and settle.” The major changes in policy included inviting participation by all interested parties in any settlement negotiations, more aggressive defense of claims based on alleged non-discretionary duties or deadlines, and refusal to pay attorneys fees to plaintiffs in connection with settlements. View Full Post
On October 16, 2017, EPA Administrator Pruitt issued a memo to his agency directing that managers take certain steps to curtail the practice known as “sue and settle.” This practice most often is used for relatively quick resolution of citizen suits by environmental groups against the EPA involving the agency’s failure to comply with statutory deadlines for issuance of regulations.  View Full Post
We have strange bedfellows, as business groups, states and environmentalists maneuver before the Supreme Court over the Obama Administration regulation defining “waters of the US” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Organizations supporting and opposing the rule all argue that the Court should overrule the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals holding that the legitimacy of the WOTUS regulation must be decided by an appellate court under the terms of the CWA. View Full Post
The most active agency in carrying out the Trump agenda in its first year has been the EPA, where there has been a raft of efforts to roll back the regulatory initiatives of the Obama Administration. However, in one area the agency has promised to take a more active approach, with Administrator Pruitt promising to aggressively push the Superfund program to make progress on long-delayed cleanups.  View Full Post
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals revived a contribution action under CERCLA, and in the course of ruling, it addressed three issues of first impression in the Circuit regarding contribution litigation under CERCLA. Asarco, LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Company. First, it joined the Seventh Circuit in holding that a settlement entered into under an authority other than CERCLA could give rise to a CERCLA contribution action. View Full Post