LXBN TV: As Supreme Court Defines “Clothes,” Biggest Impact Will Be On Judiciary’s Deference to D.O.L.—Arthur Rooney

Posted on February 25, 2013 by Colin O'Keefe

It’s one of those cases quick to generate a smirk as individuals quickly glance the basic facts: yes, the Supreme Court will indeed rule on the definition of “clothes” in Sandifer v. U.S. Steel. But the bigger issue here is in fact the level of deference given to the Department of Labor as they, through opinions expressed in administrator’s interpretations, have gone back and forth on this issue. Joining me to explain the background of the case and its impact is Arthur Rooney of Seyfarth Shaw and The Wage & Hour Litigation Blog

Recommend:

Conference Coverage

Video interviews

Network Twitter Feed

LXBNLXBN: The Direction of CEQA “Reform” Under Proposed SB 731: One Step Up and Three Steps Back? http://t.co/BNOOs6CEIc - @msrlegal
2 days ago
LXBNLXBN: Great Disappearing Acts: CA Considers Two Bills Addressing the Removal of Online Information of Minors http://t.co/2KLVOMA2eZ - @MintzLevin
2 days ago
LXBNLXBN: Will the IRS Scandal Derail Tax Reform? http://t.co/fVMlhEJ9FJ - @Politics_Law
2 days ago
LXBNLXBN: CalPERS Releases Circular Addressing Affordable Care Act http://t.co/rMCRVxWUJK - @lcwlegal
2 days ago
LXBNLXBN: Washington’s New BUI Laws: Now Alcohol and Water Really Do Not Mix http://t.co/gKq2dySY0M - @GrahamDunnPC
2 days ago
Join Us on Facebook

Become a Part of the Conversation

LexBlog partners with professionals to develop custom social media solutions and strategies that foster impactful relationships through powerful Internet identities.

Learn more

New to The LexBlog Network